RE: "Case survey" stuff from NetApp

From: Todd C. Merrill (tmerrill@mathworks.com)
Date: Thu Apr 26 2001 - 16:59:22 EDT

  • Next message: Chuck Ross: "SecureShare Quota Manager"

    On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Sullivan, Justin wrote:

    > Customer feedback is EXTREMELY important to us. I really can't stress
    > how vital it really is. You should *NEVER* get "okay" support from
    > Network Appliance.. It should always be AT LEAST "good".

            I've been called by surveyors on the phone (for other vendors),
    and when I rate something as "okay" they ask "What was wrong?"
    Well, nothing was wrong; it was just an ordinary call! Then I have to
    explain what *I* think is good, because apparently they think
    everything should be "excellent," including as was mentioned here, just
    sending out a new disk. It's pretty hard to be "excellent" at that!
    (Unless there is a T-shirt in the box, too.)

            Perhaps the rating terms could be links to what you consider
    "okay" or "good" or whatever. In my book, good and okay are pretty much
    synonymous, but you think otherwise. No offense intended; it's just
    people interpret these terms differently. If we know what you mean by
    each term, we can more accurately classify the call.

    E.g.:

    Please rate the tech support person for this call:

    Excellent ()
    Good ()
    Neutral ()
    Fair ()
    Poor ()

    Click on each of these and it brings you to a definitions page:

    Excellent/wow: Service above the call of duty. You find yourself saying,
    "Wow, now *that's* service. Fan-fscking-tastic!" You could ask for no
    better, except perhaps receiving a free T-shirt for being a good customer.

    Good/okay: Call was handled expeditously and was resolved in less time than
    expected. Person called with updates as necessary and kept me in the
    loop on any progress, or lack of progress.

    Neutral/eh: Call was handled properly and was resolved on time, plus or
    minus a bit. Could have expected better, could have expected worse.
    Middle-of-the-road.

    Fair/kinda stunk: Something slipped and the resolution was
    incorrect, or required more callbacks than expected. Wasn't kept
    informed of progress. Perhaps the process needs improvement or the
    person had a bad hair day.

    Poor/sucked big time: Call could have been handled better by a roomful
    of monkeys at keyboards. Person should not be allowed to breed. Will
    be selling all my NetApp stock by day's end.

    That's pretty much how I approximately and humorously view ratings like
    this, or 1-5 ratings. "Grade inflation" IMHO completely ruins any faith
    I have in ratings; most calls should fall in the middle rating to allow
    for the extreme calls to fall in a nice bell curve distribution around
    it. Descriptions should be worded to that goal, and adjusted on a
    periodic basis if the curve tends to skew towards one side, more than
    likely the "excellent" side. ;)

            Until next time...

    The Mathworks, Inc. 508-647-7000 x7792
    3 Apple Hill Drive, Natick, MA 01760-2098 508-647-7001 FAX
    tmerrill@mathworks.com http://www.mathworks.com

    ---
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Apr 26 2001 - 17:01:38 EDT