(no subject)

From: George Kahler (george@YorkU.CA)
Date: Tue Mar 15 2005 - 11:34:47 EST

  • Next message: Maren S. Leizaola: "Requests on Slashdot for donations for OpenBSD."

    Hi -
    I have all our Oracle9i databases defined as individual qtrees spread
    over two filers. Some time ago the decision was to split an individual
    database into 3 separate components (qtrees), one for the data
    (tables) the other two qtrees for duplex logs, one on each filer head.
    A Sun Solaris 8 dataserver that runs 6 Oracle databases then has 18 nfs mounts.

    On the recommendation of NetApp the qtrees are mounted with these
    options: rw,hard,intr,bg,proto=tcp,llock

    The DBAs now would like to have this rearranged so that there is a
    single qtree per dataserver host (think of this as one large blob of
    space) with ALL of the databases that this server will run as a
    sub-directory of this qtree.

    I'm a bit worried over the resultant nfs performance all going though
    this single mount point. Can someone comment on the issues of multiple
    nfs mounts vs. a single mount ?
    What about locking ?

    Thanks,
    George



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 15 2005 - 11:40:00 EST