RE:

From: Hill, Aaron (aaron.hill@navitaire.com)
Date: Tue Sep 17 2002 - 18:40:26 EDT

  • Next message: courier@telica.com: "Re: NetApp Gripe."

    Hi Bruno,
     We ran Solaris 2.6 with ASE 12.0 for a while with the devices on our F820
    and F880 but ran into some major performance issues. Mostly related to
    network throughput. Once we moved to 2.8 and SUN 2.0 Gigabit NICS, these
    problems disappeared.
     I am not a sybase expert, but I know we have a separate volume that we
    perform sybase dumps to. We ftp the dumps daily to a F820 at our Disaster
    Recovery site. This process works fine as long as we have bandwidth
    available on the WAN. We would have preferred to use Snapmirror, but that
    requires ASE 12.5 and a special quiesce procedure. You can find more on this
    at the NetApp NOW website, I think the article is a whitepaper on Sybase
    Disaster Recovery.

    If you have any more specific questions, let me know, I may be able have a
    chat to our Sybase Architect.

    Thanks,
    Aaron

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Bruno Boyer [mailto:bboyer@refer.org]
    Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 7:53 PM
    To: toasters@mathworks.com
    Subject:

    Has anyone got experience with doing Sybase (ASE 12.5, Solaris 2.6 and 2.8)
    dump on NetApp filers ?

    I am looking for recommendations on this subject: what is the best
    architecture ? What are the traps to be avoided? Perfomances ? Etc.

    Thank you for your help.

    Bruno.

    -------------------------------------------------
    This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Sep 17 2002 - 18:48:17 EDT