All right, well I have tried that before without modifying the /etc/passwd,
it does not work well.. well let me know if u are able to do it so that I will do the
test again.
Cheers,
-----Original Message-----
From: "Jacek Nogala" <J.Nogala@dimax.pl>
To: <toasters@mathworks.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 15:25:38 +0100
Subject: RE: Problems with SecureShare Quota Manager 2.0
> > Well, I think it need to work with AMS 2.0
> > if there isn't any entries in the passwd file,
> > it will not be able to implement user quota
>
> >From NOW Knowledgebase:
>
> ---
>
> Solution ID: ntapcs2694
>
> Title: Use SecureShare Quota Manager 2.0 to manage quotas on Data
> ONTAP 6.1 - NetApp filer
>
> Problem Environment:
> CIFS-only
>
> Problem Description:
> Use SecureShare Quota Manager 2.0 to manage quotas
>
>
> Fix:
> With Data ONTAP 6.1, SSQM 2.0 only needs to be used to manage quotas.
> If the filer is "CIFS-only", the /etc/passwd file does not need to be
> populated with CIFS users for quotas to work properly.
>
> ---
>
> And the problem is with default quotas (and tree quotas in general).
> Individual user quotas can be setup without any problems (and no
> Windows accounts in /etc/passwd).
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jacek Nogala
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: "Jacek Nogala" <J.Nogala@dimax.pl>
> > To: <toasters@mathworks.com>
> > Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 13:44:25 +0100
> > Subject: Problems with SecureShare Quota Manager 2.0
> >
> > > Does anyone have any experience with SSQM 2.0 in Windows only
> > > environment? I had to install it for evaluation tests and
> > it acts very
> > > strangely for me:
> > >
> > > SecureShare Quota Manager 2.0 was installed on Windows NT4/SP6a
> > > computer. Filer was running DOT 6.1.1R2 and was
> > configured as Windows
> > > only. No user account migration was done (in accordance to NOW
> > > Knowledgebase it is not required).
> > >
> > > The following problems were observed:
> > > - There seems to be no way to define if quota is of user
> > or tree type.
> > > Result of using Default Quota Setting seemed to be
> > random: most of the
> > > time it generated "user" default quota but sometimes "tree" type
> > > quota. Type of default quota seemed to be somewhat related to
> > > restarting SSQM application.
> > >
> > > - In those seldom times when it generated "tree" default
> > quota it also
> > > allowed to create of default "tree" quota for qtree that
> > caused quota
> > > system to stop (/etc/quotas could not be interpreted by
> > quota system):
> > > * tree@/vol/SQL 100M -
> > > * tree@/vol/SQL/test 100G -
> > >
> > > Is it possible to manage tree type quotas using SecureShare Quota
> > > Manager 2.0?
> > > If so: How user can define tree quota (default and specific) for
> > > qtree?
> > > Is it posible to define with SSQM 2.0 in the same time
> > default user
> > > quota and tree quota for different targets? How to do it?
> > >
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Jacek Nogala
> > >
> > > *****************************************************
> > > Jacek Nogala tel: +48 (22) 607-04-53
> > > Inzynier Systemowy kom: +48 605 67-22-12
> > > NetApp Filer CA e-mail: J.Nogala@dimax.pl
> > >
> > > Dimax Polska Sp. z o.o.
> > > ul. Marynarska 19A
> > > 02-674 Warszawa
> > > *****************************************************
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 27 2002 - 09:46:11 EST